tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8043734214628314454.post3932661046885324097..comments2023-12-24T03:26:11.318+11:00Comments on Wise Leaders Blog - Ian Berry's Blog: Re-imagine and then take actionIan Berryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14401434083071713084noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8043734214628314454.post-24670307830870257142011-09-27T06:56:18.488+10:002011-09-27T06:56:18.488+10:00I liked this "sparkenation" since it sup...I liked this "sparkenation" since it supplements the previous one. It could come out as a decent suggestion for the Australian Government according to not being able to understand, what people really want.<br />I suppose it wouldn't be incorrect to call the law, which government has to deal with, as a specific kind of investment, investment towards country's welfare, since it still results in appropriate outcomes, which are absolutely dependent on how that business is being dealt with. Just, probably, in this case the outcome is more intangible, but still an outcome, which increases welfare of citizens, and which, sooner or later, provides with positive benefit for government itself.<br /><br />Looking both from ethical and economic perspectives, it's a win-win situation for both sides.<br /><br />However, just wondered, why then government usually (and in most countries) doesn't or is not able to deal with that kind of "investment" in appropriate way, which would be beneficial for both sides, at least in a long-run. Maybe they have many better ways to "invest" and benefit faster, unfortunately it appears just in a short-run. Or is it a reason, mentioned with an example of Australian Government.<br />Just wondering...UzSinoreply@blogger.com